together u d two strings. On their own, these operations may seem harmless, but when combined, they create a potential for abuse and exploitation.
One of the main concerns with OP CAT is its impact on the size of the blockchain. Bitcoin’s blockchain is already quite large, and adding unnecessary data to it can lead to scalability issues. The more data that is added, the longer it takes to process transactions, and the more resources are required to maintain the network.
Additionally, OP CAT introduces a level of complexity to Bitcoin’s scripting language. This complexity can make it more difficult for developers to understand and implement secure applications. It also increases the risk of bugs and vulnerabilities, which could be exploited by malicious actors.
Furthermore, the use of memes and superficial content to promote and discuss consensus changes raises questions about the seriousness and professionalism of the Bitcoin community. While memes can be entertaining and engaging, they may not be the most effective or reliable way to make important decisions about the future of a valuable protocol like Bitcoin.
In contrast to the meme campaigns, there are individuals like Rijndael Artificer at Taproot Wizards who are actively working on practical use cases for Bitcoin’s scripting language. Rijndael has developed a demo of an OP CAT based covenant script that enforces specific conditions for spending Bitcoin. This kind of practical application is a more meaningful and valuable contribution to the Bitcoin ecosystem.
There are already existing proposals, such as CTV and APO, that can handle the use cases that OP CAT aims to address. These proposals are more efficient and have been thoroughly researched and tested. It begs the question of why OP CAT is necessary when there are already viable alternatives available.
In conclusion, while cat memes may dominate the internet, using them as a basis for making consensus changes to Bitcoin is questionable. The potential risks and complexities introduced by OP CAT should not be downplayed or ignored. Instead, the Bitcoin community should focus on practical and well-researched solutions that can address the needs of the ecosystem without compromising its security and scalability.